o the Supreme Court of Canada's
decision concerning the "duty to defend" obligation
in the context of a sexual abuse claim; Non-Marine Underwriters,
Lloyd's of London v. Scalera, 2000 SCC 24
o the Supreme Court of Canada's
decision as to whether the existence of insurance may be
disclosed to a jury; Hamstra (Guardian ad litem of) v. British
Columbia Rugby Union [1997] 1 S.C.R. 1092
o the Supreme Court of Canada's
examination of whether an "All Risk" property
insurance policy is a policy of "Fire Insurance"
for the purpose of the Insurance Act; Churchland v. Gore
Mutual Insurance Co., 2003 SCC 26
o the ambit of coverage for an
insured's current and past undisclosed partnerships and
joint venture activities in the context of a general liability
policy: Kingsway General Insurance Co. v. Lougheed Enterprises
Ltd., 2004 BCCA 421, 32 B.C.L.R. (4th) 56
o whether psychological harm amounts
to bodily injury for the purpose of a D & O exclusion:
Wellington Guarantee v. Evangelical Lutheran Church in Canada,
[1996] 9 W.W.R. 373; leave to appeal to the Supreme Court
of Canada refused, [1996] S.C.C.A. No. 322
o the method of allocation between
the Directors and Officers and their uninsured company:
Coronation Insurance Co. v. Clearly Canadian Beverage Corp.
(1999), 168 D.L.R. (4th) 366 (B.C.C.A.)
o the Ontario Supreme Court’s
decision as to whether defects in building construction
constitute an “accident” or “property damage”
for the purpose of a general liability policy: Russel Metals
Inc. v. Ball Construction Inc. (2007), 55 C.C.L.I. (4th)
241
o the British Columbia Supreme Court decision
concerning the application of the “absolute pollution”
exclusion in a general liability policy in response to environmentally
regulated contaminants: Dave’s K&K Sandblasting
(1998) Ltd. v. Aviva Insurance Co. of Canada, [2007] 51
C.C.L.I. (4th) 229.
